Is a VBAC a Valid Choice?What is a VBAC? VBAC stands for a Vaginal Birth After C-section or Vaginal Birth After Cesarean. Years ago, you would have heard "once a c-section was always a c-section." Then it became okay to have at the very least a trial of labor after a c-section....now many women are told VBACs are unsafe. So what are the facts? Are VBACs High Risk? Well, the short answer is no but don't take our word for it. Rather listen to Dr. Bruce Flamm - MD - who states that women who are contemplating a VBAC "have been erroneously told that they are in a very high-risk group." However, according to Dr. Flamm: the fact that "a VBAC candidate will require emergency surgery is, for all practical purposes, no higher than that of any other pregnant woman." Who is Dr. Flamm? Bruce Flamm is a clinical professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of California, Irvine. In addition to delivering several thousand babies he has published dozens of research papers and two books on cesarean section, America's most common major operation. Dr. Flamm has been a lifelong advocate of science over superstition and critical thinking over mysticism. So if doctors refuse to let women have VBACs and this is not based on facts, what is it based on? Truly, it is mostly based on fear of law suits as well as hospital politics. Doctors use scare tactics rather than informed consent - which would mean giving moms-to-be all the facts and then let them make a choice. In case you did not know, doctors no longer practice evidence based medicine but rather "defensive" medicine - aka "cover my rear medicine." Now, in their defense, doctors have been sued left and right and many of those law suits are frivolous and this affects us all. The facts are that if you were to compare birthing moms who chose a repeat c-section versus the moms who chose a vaginal birth both would show some increased risks to the mothers. Nevertheless, unless a c-section is truly medically indicated, a vaginal birth - meaning a VBAC - is still safer. In March of 2010, doctors at the National Institutes of Health VBAC Conference stated: that the risks associated with a VBAC were extremely low and that a trial of labor after a cesarean was not risky. What!!!!! Read more about VBAC and informed consent here.
So what is all the talk about the risk of a uterine rupture during a VBAC? Before we cover this subject, there are some factors we must consider: what type of scar are we talking about (vertical or horizontal), was the labor induced or spontaneous and lastly what type of rupture are we talking about - true uterine rupture versus uterine dehiscence?
There is also a little known secret...choosing a repeat c-section does not eliminate the risk of a uterine rupture, it only lowers your risks. Did you read this right? Yes, you did. It seems that the highest risks are for women whose labor is either induced and/or augmented - usually with pitocin. So why are doctors still inducing moms with a previous c-section???? Women are induced because the medical community does not believe in a woman's ability to labor and birth her baby unassisted without modern medicine. Doctors do provide services that most women believe they need. Also, doctors prey on the fact that most women at the end of their pregnancy "just want the baby out!" and get it over with. Some women justify an induction by saying it is easier to plan...however, recovery from major surgery is not a walk in the park - especially when you have a newborn to take care of. Trying to force your body to go into labor and birth your baby will always result in more interventions some of which are likely to lead you to a cesarean at the very worst and a more painful difficult labor at the very least. Moreover, c-sections are not a low risk procedure. They are major abdominal surgery. They carry higher risks for you and your baby. Our opinion: Women should be given all the facts so that they can make an informed decision and doctors should live up to their vow of "first, do no harm" and this should include not performing unnecessary surgeries. Does this mean all women can have a successful VBAC...sadly no. Does it mean all women should be given the opportunity to have a VBAC...yes. Read about a VBAC of triplets! For more birth stories including VBACs Click Here! To leave a comment or review about VBACs Click Here A VBAC ~ Read others' comments and reviews. You Might Also LikeWould You Like to Share this Page? It's easy, just click on the code below and paste. The code will read as follows: What is a VABC? A VBAC: ReviewsAny thoughts? A story of your own? Share with us! Sources: Landon (2004), a study of 18,000 women, found, "A trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery is associated with a greater perinatal risk than is elective repeated cesarean delivery without labor, although absolute risks are low." Fang (2006) which was a overview of the VBAC research to date concluded, "Because repeat cesarean deliveries are performed largely to benefit the neonate, clinicians may often overlook maternal complications resulting in significant morbidity and even mortality as a result of repeated surgeries... Because neither VBAC nor elective repeat cesarean delivery is without maternal and neonatal risks, VBAC should remain a viable option for clinicians and patients in the new millennium. Vaginal birth should not become a relic of the 20th century!" Mankuta (2003) "favors a trial of labor if it has a chance of success of 50% or above and if the wish for additional pregnancies after a cesarean section is estimated at near 10% to 20% or above because the delayed risks from a repeated cesarean section are greater than its immediate benefit." Rageth (1999), a study of 29,000 women, confirmed, "A history of cesarean delivery significantly elevates the risks for mother and child in future deliveries. Nonetheless, a trial of labor after previous cesarean is safe. Induction of labor, epidural anesthesia, failure to progress, and abnormal fetal heart rate pattern are all associated with failure of a trial of labor and uterine rupture." Silver (2006) was a four year study of 30,000 women undergoing up to six repeat cesareans determined, "Because serious maternal morbidity increases progressively with increasing number of cesarean deliveries, the number of intended pregnancies should be considered during counseling regarding elective repeat cesarean operation versus a trial of labor and when debating the merits of elective primary cesarean delivery." Mercer (2008), a study of 13,532 women found, "An increasing number of prior VBACs is associated with a greater probability of VBAC success, as well as a lower risk of uterine rupture and perinatal complications in the current pregnancy." |
What's New |
|||
PregnancyChildbirthNatural Birth StoriesFathers and BirthNatural MotherhoodFree Newsletter[?] Subscribe To This Site |
||||
|
| Home | Search Site | What's New | Link with Us | Store | Directory | About | Contact Us | Site Map | Who's Who | Site Dedication | Disclaimers
Return to top |
||||
| Copyright© 2008-2011 | ||||